TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Dimension Data to be renamed NTT Data

      27 October 2023

      Karpowership gets green light for Richards Bay plant

      27 October 2023

      Why people wave on Zoom

      27 October 2023

      Microsoft gaining ground in cloud race with AWS, Google

      27 October 2023

      Black Friday to create an extra R26.6-billion in retail turnover

      26 October 2023
    • World

      Huawei sees growth in cloud, digital power segments

      27 October 2023

      Intel beats expectations; manufacturing momentum builds

      27 October 2023

      Google CEO to testify on Monday in antitrust trial

      27 October 2023

      China rushes to swap Western tech for domestic options

      26 October 2023

      Alphabet, Meta deliver solid financial performances

      26 October 2023
    • In-depth

      Quantum computers in 2023: what they do and where they’re heading

      22 October 2023

      How did Stephen van Coller really do as EOH CEO?

      19 October 2023

      Risc-V emerges as new front in US-China tech war

      6 October 2023

      Get ready for a tidal wave of software M&A

      26 September 2023

      Watch | A tour of Vumatel’s Alexandra fibre roll-out

      19 September 2023
    • TCS

      TCS | Mesh.trade’s Connie Bloem on the future of finance

      26 October 2023

      TCS | Rahul Jain on Peach Payments’ big funding round

      23 October 2023

      TCS+ | How MiWay uses conversation analytics

      16 October 2023

      TCS+ | The story behind MTN SuperFlex

      13 October 2023

      TCS | The Information Regulator bares its teeth – an interview with Pansy Tlakula

      6 October 2023
    • Opinion

      Big banks, take note: PayShap should be free

      20 October 2023

      Eskom rolling out virtual wheeling – here’s how it works

      4 October 2023

      How blockchain can help defeat the scourge of counterfeit goods

      29 September 2023

      There’s more to the skills crisis than emigration

      29 September 2023

      The role of banks in Africa’s digital future

      22 August 2023
    • Company Hubs
      • 4IRI
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Systems Integration
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • CoCre8
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • E4
      • Entelect
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • iKhokha
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • LSD Open
      • Maxtec
      • MiRO
      • NEC XON
      • Next DLP
      • Ricoh
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Velocity Group
      • Videri Digital
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • E-commerce
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Metaverse and gaming
      • Motoring and transport
      • Open-source software
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Sections » Fintech » Tap on phone vs peer-to-peer payments: which is better?

    Tap on phone vs peer-to-peer payments: which is better?

    Promoted | If you’re running a business, here are five reasons why tap-on-phone technology is the best low-cost payment option for your business.
    By iKhokha25 April 2023
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    Tap-on-phone technology and peer-to-peer (P2P) payments are two different methods of facilitating financial transactions, but they share some similarities in terms of their convenience and accessibility.

    Tap-on-phone technology refers to a contactless payment method that enables customers to make payments using a mobile phone as a point-of-sale (POS) device. The merchant’s mobile phone is used as a card reader, allowing customers to tap their contactless card on the phone to make a payment.

    This technology is gaining popularity in South Africa, where it is being adopted by small businesses and merchants as an alternative to traditional POS devices.

    When comparing tap-on-phone technology with P2P payments, there are some notable differences

    P2P payments, on the other hand, are transactions between individuals who use mobile apps or online platforms to send money to one another.

    These transactions can be initiated from a bank account or a digital wallet. P2P payment platforms are also gaining popularity in South Africa, where they are used for various purposes, including splitting bills, paying for goods and services, and sending money to family and friends.

    When comparing tap-on-phone technology with P2P payments, there are some notable differences. Tap-on-phone technology is primarily used by merchants to accept payments, while P2P payments are used by individuals to send and receive money.

    If you’re running a business, here are five reasons why tap-on-phone technology is the best low-cost payment option for your business.

    1. No maximum transfer

    A key difference between the two offerings is the maximum transfer amount. P2P payments are often capped with leading South African providers limiting transactions to R3 000. However, with tap-on-phone transactions there are no limits.

    2. Available to any bank

    Currently, P2P is only available through selected banks, namely FNB, Standard Bank, Absa and Nedbank. Tap on phone on the other hand can accept payments using any South African bank card.

    3. Customers don’t need an app

    With P2P payments, both parties need to have registered for the service via their banking app to conduct a payment. With tap-on-phone technology, the merchant’s app facilitates the transaction using the customer’s bank card, which removes a possible barrier to payment.

    4. Process refunds

    Card-based transactions through POS devices (including tap-on-phone technology) allow businesses to process refunds, which increases professionalism and customer satisfaction.

    5. Access to funding

    Providers like iKhokha offer easier access to business funding when compared to traditional bank loans. With iKhokha’ s iK Tap on Phone, merchants can start selling with no upfront investment in POS hardware and access working capital after just three months of trading.

    Find out more about iK Tap on Phone at www.ikhokha.com.

    • Read more articles by iKhokha on TechCentral
    • This promoted content was paid for by the party concerned
    iK Tap on Phone iKhokha iKhokha iK Tap on Phone iKhokha Tap on Phone
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleEskom’s new plan to reduce load shedding
    Next Article 1Stream ticks all the CRM boxes with its all-in-one solution

    Related Posts

    Acsa aims for carbon neutrality by 2050

    27 October 2023

    Huawei sees growth in cloud, digital power segments

    27 October 2023

    Dimension Data to be renamed NTT Data

    27 October 2023
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Promoted

    Acsa aims for carbon neutrality by 2050

    27 October 2023

    Flutter vs React Native: a comprehensive comparison

    27 October 2023

    iKhokha, Shopstar pave the way for simpler e-commerce

    27 October 2023
    Opinion

    Big banks, take note: PayShap should be free

    20 October 2023

    Eskom rolling out virtual wheeling – here’s how it works

    4 October 2023

    How blockchain can help defeat the scourge of counterfeit goods

    29 September 2023

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2023 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.