TechCentralTechCentral
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    WhatsApp Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    TechCentralTechCentral
    • News

      Dimension Data to be renamed NTT Data

      27 October 2023

      DStv makes RWC final stream available for R19.95

      27 October 2023

      Karpowership gets green light for Richards Bay plant

      27 October 2023

      Why people wave on Zoom

      27 October 2023

      Microsoft gaining ground in cloud race with AWS, Google

      27 October 2023
    • World

      Intel beats expectations; manufacturing momentum builds

      27 October 2023

      Google CEO to testify on Monday in antitrust trial

      27 October 2023

      Huawei sees growth in cloud, digital power segments

      27 October 2023

      China rushes to swap Western tech for domestic options

      26 October 2023

      Alphabet, Meta deliver solid financial performances

      26 October 2023
    • In-depth

      Quantum computers in 2023: what they do and where they’re heading

      22 October 2023

      How did Stephen van Coller really do as EOH CEO?

      19 October 2023

      Risc-V emerges as new front in US-China tech war

      6 October 2023

      Get ready for a tidal wave of software M&A

      26 September 2023

      Watch | A tour of Vumatel’s Alexandra fibre roll-out

      19 September 2023
    • TCS

      TCS | Mesh.trade’s Connie Bloem on the future of finance

      26 October 2023

      TCS | Rahul Jain on Peach Payments’ big funding round

      23 October 2023

      TCS+ | How MiWay uses conversation analytics

      16 October 2023

      TCS+ | The story behind MTN SuperFlex

      13 October 2023

      TCS | The Information Regulator bares its teeth – an interview with Pansy Tlakula

      6 October 2023
    • Opinion

      Big banks, take note: PayShap should be free

      20 October 2023

      Eskom rolling out virtual wheeling – here’s how it works

      4 October 2023

      How blockchain can help defeat the scourge of counterfeit goods

      29 September 2023

      There’s more to the skills crisis than emigration

      29 September 2023

      The role of banks in Africa’s digital future

      22 August 2023
    • Company Hubs
      • 4IRI
      • Africa Data Centres
      • Altron Document Solutions
      • Altron Systems Integration
      • Arctic Wolf
      • AvertITD
      • CoCre8
      • CYBER1 Solutions
      • Digicloud Africa
      • Digimune
      • E4
      • Entelect
      • ESET
      • Euphoria Telecom
      • iKhokha
      • Incredible Business
      • iONLINE
      • LSD Open
      • Maxtec
      • MiRO
      • NEC XON
      • Next DLP
      • Ricoh
      • Skybox Security
      • SkyWire
      • Velocity Group
      • Videri Digital
    • Sections
      • AI and machine learning
      • Banking
      • Broadcasting and Media
      • Cloud computing
      • Consumer electronics
      • Cryptocurrencies
      • E-commerce
      • Education and skills
      • Energy
      • Fintech
      • Information security
      • Internet and connectivity
      • Internet of Things
      • Investment
      • IT services
      • Metaverse and gaming
      • Motoring and transport
      • Open-source software
      • Public sector
      • Science
      • Social media
      • Talent and leadership
      • Telecoms
    • Events
    • Advertise
    TechCentralTechCentral
    Home » Opinion » Hilton Tarrant » A theory on why R2/MB still exists

    A theory on why R2/MB still exists

    By Hilton Tarrant27 June 2016
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email

    hilton-tarrant-180Allow me to venture a theory… The reason out-of-bundle mobile data rates are (largely) still R2/MB is to help shore up operators’ cratering voice revenue.

    R2 is an arbitrary number, a relic from over a decade ago, but it’s a stubborn one that’s showing no signs of disappearing anytime soon. Let me explain.

    These days, the answer could lie in the data usage of voice calling on over-the-top (VoIP, or voice over Internet protocol) services like WhatsApp, FaceTime, Google Hangouts, Facebook Messenger and Skype.

    Actual use will vary because of network conditions, but a FaceTime (audio) call will use approximately 500KB to 700KB per minute. One oft-cited statistic is 3MB for a five-minute call (600KB/minute). A test by Android Authority has Google Hangouts using an average of 681KB, WhatsApp 741KB and Skype 875KB/minute respectively. Facebook Messenger uses the most compression and is the most efficient of the more popular apps, using 333KB of data per minute, on average.

    At R2/MB out of bundle, this works out to an effective rate per minute of about R1,20 if you use FaceTime (audio). A voice call on the most popular messaging application in South Africa, WhatsApp, will cost you an effective R1,48/minute out of bundle. And even using the most efficient of these, Facebook Messenger, will cost you an effective 60c/minute out of bundle.

    Compare this to prepaid voice tariffs which run from 66c to the R1,20 mark across all four networks (and which probably generally tend closer to the 79c or 99c/minute mark).

    Why would an operator rationally choose to cut an out-of-bundle data price which would allow its prepaid customers, the most price-sensitive segment by far, to make voice calls on services like WhatsApp at a lower price than a native (GSM) voice call?

    If that out-of-bundle price was 50c/MB, an out-of-bundle VoIP call would cost an effective 37c/minute. Imagine what the tens of millions of prepaid customers would do if they knew they could make voice calls on WhatsApp for half the price of the cheapest (non-bundle) voice call?

    The cheapest out-of-bundle price — aside from challenger network Telkom, which is at an unbelievably low 29c — is R1/MB on certain of MTN’s and Cell C’s tariff plans. At the R1 rate, an equivalent voice call (over VoIP) is 74c/minute, which i a little too close to those GSM voice rates for comfort.

    Mobile operators hate these VoIP apps, characterising them as “over-the-top” services. It’s no surprise that they’ve been lobbying lawmakers locally to regulate them. The “arguments” go something like this: these apps don’t invest in infrastructure and are given a “free ride”, they’re not “subject” to regulations in the way that the operators are, and nor do they pay tax in the country. Boo hoo!

    Image courtesy of downloadsource.fr CC BY 2.0
    Image courtesy of downloadsource.fr CC BY 2.0

    Vodacom’s full-year results show the split of in- and out-of-bundle revenue across the post-paid (contract) and prepaid bases. Total revenue across each of these customer bases is roughly similar, at R22,6bn for the former and R20,6bn for the latter. But R16bn is in-bundle on contract (rather obviously), with only R6,5bn not in-bundle. On prepaid, this is almost the exact reverse at R4bn in-bundle and R16,5bn out. Again, this is logical and expected, but look how much of that prepaid revenue is out-of-bundle (>80%).

    With an overall (post-paid and prepaid) revenue split of 55% voice, 39% data and 6% SMS on Vodacom in South Africa, it’s relatively easy to imagine just how much out-of-bundle spend is data. Sure, data bundle usage will be over-indexed on the upper end of the (prepaid) market, but I’d argue that voice bundle usage will be similarly above average on the lower end.

    This would help normalise the use of out-of-bundle data across the base. Vodacom says it sold 343m data bundles during the last financial year out of 1,1bn voice and data bundles (meaning >750 million voice bundles). There is a lot of out-of-bundle data usage (on prepaid, in particular). No wonder operators will never disclose these numbers.

    Bringing these rates so much closer together — or worse, dropping out-of-bundle data prices to mean effective VoIP rates will be below GSM voice tariffs — will remove whatever incentives remain to use voice. Data bundles themselves are not inexpensive, but at least here an operator is locking in higher spend from a customer (and it can count on a portion of the bundle simply expiring, making them more expensive in real terms).

    Mobile operators will quite literally do anything to protect (very profitable) voice revenue. And, with the voice market in structural decline, they’re not about to make any price changes that threaten to accelerate that fall.

    • Hilton Tarrant works at immedia
    • This column was first published on Moneyweb and is used here with permission
    Facebook Google Hilton Tarrant Skype Telkom Vodacom WhatsApp
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleShuter’s experience ideal for MTN: analysts
    Next Article Living in sim: the science behind Musk’s theory

    Related Posts

    Google CEO to testify on Monday in antitrust trial

    27 October 2023

    Microsoft gaining ground in cloud race with AWS, Google

    27 October 2023

    Alphabet, Meta deliver solid financial performances

    26 October 2023
    Promoted

    Acsa aims for carbon neutrality by 2050

    27 October 2023

    iKhokha, Shopstar pave the way for simpler e-commerce

    27 October 2023

    Flutter vs React Native: a comprehensive comparison

    27 October 2023
    Opinion

    Big banks, take note: PayShap should be free

    20 October 2023

    Eskom rolling out virtual wheeling – here’s how it works

    4 October 2023

    How blockchain can help defeat the scourge of counterfeit goods

    29 September 2023

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the best South African technology news and analysis delivered to your e-mail inbox every morning.

    © 2009 - 2023 NewsCentral Media

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.